Upon careful consideration of all the assignments of error raised by the Appellants 1 and reviewing the record, this Court finds that the Appellees were deprived of their constitutionally protected property right to be recalled to employment without due process of law. Subsequently, the State Defendants and the Orleans Parish School Board sought this Court's appellate review. The judgment: 1) denied all peremptory exceptions filed by the defendants 2) found that there was a due process violation which resulted in wrongful termination 3) found that there was intentional and tortious interference of contract by the Louisiana Department of Education and 4) found that the Orleans Parish School Board and the Louisiana Department of Education were partners, which created joint and solidary liability.
#JEREMY PICHON TRIAL#
After a bench trial on the merits, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Orleans Parish School Board and the Louisiana Department of Education, jointly and solidarily, for compensatory damages. This class action arises out of the mass reduction in force of the Orleans Parish School Board following Hurricane Katrina. Frederick, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellants. “Buddy” Caldwell, Attorney Gerneral, Michael H. Westerhoff, Boykin Ehret & Utley, New Orleans, LA, James D. Skylar Rosenbloom, Fishamn Haygood Phelps Walmsley Willis & Swanson, LLP, Terrill Wayne Boykin, Kriste Talton Utley, Shaundra M. Glago, Glago Law Firm, LLC, Roderick Rico Alvendia, Jeremy Pichon, Jeanne Demarest, Law Offices of Alvendia, Kelly & Demarest, Willie Matthew Zanders, Sr., Juana Marine–Lombard, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellees.
Law Offices of Clarence Roby, Jr., APLC, Walter Ignatius Willard, The Willard Firm, PLC, Mark P.
DYSART).Ĭharles Mayer Samuel, III, Rittenberg Samuel & Phillips, L.L.C., Anthony David Irpino, Irpino Law Firm, Suzette Peychaud Bagneris, The Bagneris Firm, L.L.C., Clarence Roby, Jr.
Eddy OLIVER, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v.
0 kommentar(er)
